Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts

Sunday, 30 September 2007

Baha'u'llah: God-sent quickener of mankind

This article arises from a discussion that I have been having with Paul S. Pruett on his blog, "Pensees".

Paul,

Your most recent comment is very direct in raising the issue as to the Baha'i Faith being "the true religion" in the eyes of its followers. The implicit question is whether the Baha'is see their religion as the best or only path to salvation.

It must be admitted that one does not choose to be a follower of Baha'u'llah because of finding His teachings merely rather pleasant and congenial. Much more than this, in the eyes of His followers, Baha'u'llah is the defining Figure of a new age in the spiritual and social evolution of mankind, that began with His appearance in the nineteenth century. So yes, in such terms salvation today does depend ultimately on our turning towards Baha'u'llah. But His wisdom is of the unseen Kingdom far beyond mortal ken, and His salvation is of a breadth that encompasses everyone and affirms the salvation that the followers of all religions find in their own faiths. It deplores religious fanaticism and the anathematizing of others based on theological disagreements. It acknowledges the power for good that continues to be channelled through other religions. It upholds the absolute independance of God who saves (and judges) whom He will in accordance with a person's inner character rather than outward appearances.

The Baha'i teachings also deeply revere individual freedom of conscience. In matters of faith, everyone must have unrestricted freedom to decide with their own minds and hearts as to what they believe.

"Convictions and ideas are within the scope of the comprehension of the King of kings, not of kings; and soul and conscience are between the fingers of control of the Lord of hearts, not of His servants."

('Abdu'l-Baha)
The summons issued by Baha'u'llah with Divine authority is for the world in the fullness of time to become united in one common faith, and it was His mission to establish that faith, which has a Covenant, laws and institutions that comprise "the Ark of eternal salvation" for the peoples of the earth. Spiritually, then, the quintessence of faith in this day is to believe in Baha'u'llah and to live accordingly. On the other hand, this does not imply a binary choice between declaring one's faith in Baha'u'llah or facing the fires of eternal damnation. In this sense, there is no thin but impervious line of separation that can be stated in some simple formula, between those who are acceptable and not acceptable in God's sight. Rather, there is a range of responses to Him, and even the smallest of positive responses does not go unnoticed and unrewarded.

"To 'get to heaven' as you say is dependent on two things -- faith in the Manifestation of God in His Day, in other words in this Age in Baha'u'llah; and good deeds, in other words living to the best of our ability a noble life and doing unto others as we would be done by. But we must always remember that our existence and everything we have or ever will have is dependent upon the Mercy of God and His Bounty, and therefore He can accept into His heaven, which is really nearness to Him, even the lowliest if He pleases. We always have the hope of receiving His Mercy if we reach out for it."

(Shoghi Effendi)
"Concerning your question whether a soul can receive knowledge of the Truth in the world beyond. Such a knowledge is surely possible, and is but a sign of the loving Mercy of the Almighty. We can, through our prayers, help every soul to gradually attain this high station, even if it has failed to reach it in this world. The progress of the soul does not come to an end with death. It rather starts along a new line. Baha'u'llah teaches that great far- reaching possibilities await the soul in the other world. Spiritual progress in that realm is infinite, and no man, while on this earth, can visualize its full power and extent."

(Shoghi Effendi)

You wrote at an earlier stage in the discussion:

"I am asking the question that a lost soul might ask —- one who does not know the demands of your God but knows enough about himself to realize he is in need of something. I am asking the question, 'What must he do to be saved?'"

The question asked by this lost soul brings to mind these words of Baha'u'llah:

"What 'oppression' is more grievous than that a soul seeking the truth, and wishing to attain unto the knowledge of God, should know not where to go for it and from whom to seek it? For opinions have sorely differed, and the ways unto the attainment of God have multiplied."

Baha'u'llah offers liberation to the soul who is oppressed by this confused state of affairs, through the guidance that He gives as the Manifestation of God for this age. This pure and authentic guidance cuts like a bright light through the gloom of conflicting "opinions" and "ways unto the attainment of God" that have "multiplied" through the idle speculations and fruitless philosophies dreamed up by fallible human beings.

Throughout past ages, God has always given guidance to mankind through His Prophets:

"Moreover He hath in every age and cycle, in conformity with His transcendent wisdom, sent forth a divine Messenger to revive the dispirited and despondent souls with the living waters of His utterance, One Who is indeed the Expounder, the true Interpreter, inasmuch as man is unable to comprehend that which hath streamed forth from the Pen of Glory and is recorded in His heavenly Books."

(Baha'u'llah)

You suggested that if the Manifestations of God are all bringers of the Divine message, it seems to be a contradictory message, or ineffectual, since it does not sink in and has to be repeated.

God constantly repeats His message, not because of any inadequacy on the part of the chosen Messengers, but because (1) human beings, often "unable to comprehend that which hath streamed forth from the Pen of Glory", tend to misinterpret the Divine Message, so corrections are needed and (2) God releases, as time goes by, an increasing measure of Divine knowledge, which brings ever nearer the establishment of His Kingdom on earth.

In our own age, God has not been silent; He has not abandoned His creatures. More than this, we live in a momentous age when Divine grace has been poured out more copiously than ever before.

"The Revelation which, from time immemorial, hath been acclaimed as the Purpose and Promise of all the Prophets of God, and the most cherished Desire of His Messengers, hath now, by virtue of the pervasive Will of the Almighty and at His irresistible bidding, been revealed unto men. The advent of such a Revelation hath been heralded in all the sacred Scriptures. Behold how, notwithstanding such an announcement, mankind hath strayed from its path and shut out itself from its glory."

(Baha'u'llah)

The world is in turmoil because God is bringing about a great transformation in its affairs. Baha'u'llah is the herald of that transformation. The severe difficulties the world faces arise from its having paid little heed to Baha'u'llah. Hell exists, even on earth, wherever the Word of God is shut out. Paradise draws near, where His Word is heard and obeyed.

You are right then, in a sense, when you observe that for a Baha'i, "... the bottom line for salvation is that you believe that Baha'i is the true religion and you must see everything through its lens and practice its doctrines." However, you are also right in another sense when you suggest alternatively that "the Baha'i[s] are ... very liberal in their theology". The "liberal" aspect in Baha'i theology arises from belief that all religions together essentially comprise a single religion and all mankind are under the guidance and protection of one God. The Baha'is do not consider themselves inherently more enlightened as individuals than the followers of other religions, nor do we disregard the spiritual insights offered by others, nor assume that our neighbours of different faiths are destined upon their deaths for the fires of hell. Yet our very "liberalism" rests on the authority of Baha'u'llah, so it is a liberalism in vision, attitudes, and world-view, and not with regard to fundamental principles. The Manifestation of God is in our eyes infallible. We are staunch in upholding this rather unfashionable idea.

The Baha'i teachings do not overlook the differences between religions, but rather explain the reasons for such differences, correct errors that have been introduced by theologians over the course of centuries, and provide keys that resolve apparent contradictions. An example of reconciling contradictions concerns the difference that you allude to between the Muslim and Christian beliefs about Jesus' crucifixion. An authoritative statement of the Baha'i position on this is as follows: "The crucifixion as recounted in the New Testament is correct. The meaning of the Qur'anic version is that the spirit of Christ was not Crucified. There is no conflict between the two."

Contradictions often appear when things are understood on the wrong level. For example, among the Jews there was a widespread expectation that the Messiah would be a king. When He appeared amongst them as a man of humble background, those who thought this way, mocked Him. A crown of thorns was placed upon His head, which in spiritual terms was a crown of glory.

The resolution to the misunderstanding current amongst the people of those times is that Christ's kingdom was not of this world.

A great many of the misunderstandings in religion arise from a literal interpretation of statements that are intended symbolically and spiritually.

Obviously your other point about differences between Christian and Islamic beliefs on salvation raises a much more complex subject. You wrote: "Christianity teaches that you don't earn salvation; you depend upon the atonement of Jesus, who is God incarnate. Islam seems to teach that your good works (such as adhering to the 5 Pillars) must outweigh your bad."

Let's explore these apparent polarities of "faith" and "works". Asking whether salvation is attained through faith or by good deeds is a bit like asking whether light is comprised of waves or particles. The answer is, "both". And depending which aspect you focus on, you might be misled into thinking it is either one or the other.

The concept of "salvation" refers to being saved from the condition of alienation from God that is suffered by man in his "natural", unredeemed, state. In this state we are under the control of the biological urges of our bodily nature, and of various egotistical self-seeking drives. This condition is the opposite of Godliness. All the attributes of goodness, all the virtues, are from God. To be lacking in virtue, then, is to be far from God. To become virtuous is to become nearer to God. Nearness is likeness. "If ye love me, keep my commandments." (Jesus)

"O thou who art attracted to the Kingdom of God! Every soul seeketh an object and cherisheth a desire, and day and night striveth to attain his aim. One craveth riches, another thirsteth for glory and still another yearneth for fame, for art, for prosperity and the like. Yet finally all are doomed to loss and disappointment. One and all they leave behind them all that is theirs and empty-handed hasten to the realm beyond, and all their labours shall be in vain. To dust they shall all return, denuded, depressed, disheartened and in utter despair.

"But, praised be the Lord, thou art engaged in that which secureth for thee a gain that shall eternally endure; and that is naught but thine attraction to the Kingdom of God, thy faith, and thy knowledge, the enlightenment of thine heart, and thine earnest endeavour to promote the Divine Teachings.

"Verily this gift is imperishable and this wealth is a treasure from on high!"

('Abdu'l-Baha)

"For the life of the flesh is common to both men and animals, whereas the life of the spirit is possessed only by the pure in heart who have quaffed from the ocean of faith and partaken of the fruit of certitude. This life knoweth no death, and this existence is crowned by immortality. Even as it hath been said: 'He who is a true believer liveth both in this world and in the world to come.'"

(Baha'u'llah)


How do we draw nearer to God, acquiring "Divine" qualities and virtues? This is impossible without faith. So faith is the first step, and steadfastness in faith is required throughout the journey. For it is a journey, not a one-time event. To be "born again" into the light of belief is to embark on a new stage; it is not the end of the road.

As the Qur'an says, "Do men think that they will be left alone on saying, 'We believe,' and that they will not be tested?" Jesus' parable of the sower makes the same point. Not all the seed that is cast on the soil of the human heart by the Word of God germinates; and not all that germinates grows long enough to become a shrub; and not all that grows into a shrub survives to become a tree. Along the way, when tested by the heat of the sun or by harsh winds, faith can wither and die. What keeps it alive to the end? Well, action is required, such as prayer, study of the Word and reflection upon it, fellowship with other believers, and service to humanity. Always, faith and action are intertwined.

"Let the flame of the love of God burn brightly within your radiant hearts. Feed it with the oil of Divine guidance, and protect it within the shelter of your constancy. Guard it within the globe of trust and detachment from all else but God, so that the evil whisperings of the ungodly may not extinguish its light."

(Baha'u'llah)

"Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints..."

(St. Paul)

Islam emphasises practicing the five pillars for the same reason that Christians say grace before meals, attend Church on Sundays, give to charity, recite creeds and confessions of faith in their worship services, and endeavour to treat others with love and compassion. These acts give structure to the life of faith, individually and collectively, and keep faith alive.

So far as I understand, the doctrine that faith and action are closely intertwined is taught by Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox Christianity, various branches of Protestantism, and by Islam, as well as the Baha'i Faith. If there are differences to be identified on the theology of faith and works, the differences within Christianity are probably greater than any differences there may be between, say, Catholic, Islamic, and Baha'i views. Therefore, the core ideas behind the doctrines of salvation do not markedly distinguish Christianity from Islam or the Baha'i Faith.

If the journey of faith is perilous, how can we pursue it with confidence? The key to this is that faith denotes trust in God. So long as we trust in Him, we shall remain safe. Trustworthiness itself is of God, so God can be trusted. "In Him let the trusting trust." (Baha'u'llah)

The misfortunes of life can undermine our faith if we let this happen, for we might begin to say, "I trusted God, but He let me down".

"Blessed is the man that hath acknowledged his belief in God and in His signs, and recognized that 'He shall not be asked of His doings.' Such a recognition hath been made by God the ornament of every belief, and its very foundation. Upon it must depend the acceptance of every goodly deed."

(Baha'u'llah)

The phrase, "He shall not be asked of His doings" has many implications, one of which is that we should welcome the misfortunes of life as gifts from God in disguise. This attitude preserves faith. As St. Paul said, "For them who believe, all things work together for good."

It is our response to God's grace, revealed through His Prophets and Messengers, that saves us, in the Baha'i view.

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast."

(St. Paul)


"We are cognizant of thy righteous deeds, though they shall avail thee nothing; for the whole object of such righteousness is but recognition of God, thy Lord, and undoubted faith in the Words revealed by Him."

(The Bab)


"It is evident that the loftiest mansions in the Realm of Immortality have been ordained as the habitation of them that have truly believed in God and in His signs."

(Baha'u'llah)

What does it mean, to "truly believe in God and in His signs"?

Although Moses did not fail in the Mission entrusted to Him by God, the followers of the religion of Moses, in the majority, rejected Christ when He appeared. The people of that day held to the outward form of the teachings of Moses but were unaware of their true meaning. They looked and looked, but did not see.

Jesus said to them pointedly that if they were true followers of Moses, they would have accepted Him. But only a mere handful did in fact recognize that He was "the Light of the world". The appearance of Jesus, then, was a "Day of Judgement" for the followers of Moses. This is why Jesus said that He brought a sword, that divided brother against brother. Not that he advocated violence, but some accepted Him, and others rejected Him, so His word was like a sword that cut cleanly down the middle, sometimes separating believer from unbeliever within a single family.

"Nothing whatsoever shall, in this Day, be accepted from you, though ye continue to worship and prostrate yourselves before God throughout the eternity of His dominion. For all things are dependent upon His Will, and the worth of all acts is conditioned upon His acceptance and pleasure. The whole universe is but a handful of clay in His grasp. Unless one recognize God and love Him, his cry shall not be heard by God in this Day. This is of the essence of His Faith, did ye but know it."

(Baha'u'llah)


Again, Baha'u'llah warns that pious acts of worship are of no benefit: "Unless one recognize God and love Him".

By "recognize God", Baha'u'llah means, recognize the Manifestation of God for this Day, this being Himself.

The Message of Baha'u'llah, then, is a profoundly challenging message. The appearance of Baha'u'llah is again, a Day of Judgement. More than this, it is the supreme Day of Judgement, the Day foretold in the prophecies of all religions. For the Announcement that God makes through Baha'u'llah marks the end of night and the dawn of the age of light, a light that will steadily rise to its zenith, when the Kingdom of God shall be established on earth. This is the age for the gathering together of all mankind under the shelter of God's Holy law. Indeed, the teachings of Baha'u'llah are the holy city, the new Jerusalem, come down from heaven, foreseen by the author of the Book of Revelation.

The duty of the Baha'is, then, is this:

"Wherefore, O ye beloved of God, offer up thanks that ye have, in the day of the dawning, turned your faces unto the Light of the World and beheld its splendours. Ye have received a share of the light of truth, ye have enjoyed a portion of those blessings that endure forever; and therefore, as a returning of thanks for this bounty, rest ye not for a moment, sit ye not silent, carry to men's ears the glad tidings of the Kingdom, spread far and wide the Word of God."

('Abdu'l-Baha)

The message of Baha'u'llah although a challenging message is also the only real basis for the hope of peace and reconciliation amongst the peoples of the world. We, the human race, have been slow to accept Him and are paying a heavy price for it in bloodshed and chaos that could have been avoided if His message had been heeded by more people sooner. The Baha'i message contains its stern admonishments, but as I mentioned before, it does not ultimately make the sharp distinctions between believer and non-believer that tended to be made in past dispensations. There are many degrees of response to the Message, and to the degree that people respond positively to it, to that degree God's mercies surround us. The worst response, of course, is that of the active opponents who defame Baha'u'llah and persecute His followers, even to the extent of imprisoning them and killing them on account of their belief. A grave responsibility rests upon their heads.

The teachings of the Baha'i Faith are circulating in the body politic and leavening the life of the world, even where they are not identified with their Source.

The Message of Baha'u'llah is that this is the day for the unification of mankind. Those who work for peace and reconciliation are therefore acting in obedience to the Divine command. For this reason, they are not merely "treating the symptom". The very act of working for the unity of mankind attracts divine blessings, for this is what God wants. He wants His creatures to be united and for war to cease.

God's mercy encompasses the whole of mankind. His justice calls to account all mankind.

"I swear by Thy might, O my God! Wert Thou to regard Thy servants according to their deserts in Thy days, they would assuredly merit naught except Thy chastisement and torment. Thou art, however, the One Who is of great bounteousness, Whose grace is immense. Look not down upon them, O my God, with the glance of Thy justice, but rather with the eyes of Thy tender compassions and mercies. Do, then, with them according to what beseemeth Thy generosity and bountiful favor. Potent art Thou to do whatsoever may please Thee. Incomparable art Thou. No God is there beside Thee, the Lord of the throne on high and of earth below, the Ruler of this world and of the world to come. Thou art the God of Bounty, the Ever-Forgiving, the Great Giver, the Most Generous."

(Baha'u'llah)

I accept then, what Martin Luther said about Jesus being the way to salvation:

"Man may forever do as he will, he can never enter heaven unless God takes the first step with his Word, which offers him divine grace and enlightens his heart so as to get upon the right way. This right way, however, is the Lord Jesus Christ. Whoever desires to seek another way, as the great multitudes venture to do by means of their own works, has already missed the right way..."

The authority of Jesus in this context needs to be understood spiritually. Particularly in His own Day and until the coming of Muhammad, Jesus was the representative of God on earth, "the Light of the World". To reject Jesus was to shut out the light. To accept Him was to enter the presence of God. Further, the reality of Jesus is eternal and has never died, and His light continues to shine, still mediating salvation today.

The Manifestations of God are all One and the same in their identity as the Word of God. The inner reality of their being is the Holy Spirit. To believe in Jesus is to believe in Baha'u'llah.

Baha'u'llah is indeed the return of Christ. This is something to ponder, without haste.

The mission of Christ was to save souls. The mission of Baha'u'llah is to save mankind as a whole.

"The Revelation associated with the Faith of Jesus Christ focused attention primarily on the redemption of the individual and the molding of his conduct, and stressed, as its central theme, the necessity of inculcating a high standard of morality and discipline into man, as the fundamental unit in human society. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find any reference to the unity of nations or the unification of mankind as a whole. When Jesus spoke to those around Him, He addressed them primarily as individuals rather than as component parts of one universal, indivisible entity. The whole surface of the earth was as yet unexplored, and the organization of all its peoples and nations as one unit could, consequently, not be envisaged, how much less proclaimed or established. What other interpretation can be given to these words, addressed specifically by Bahá'u'lláh to the followers of the Gospel, in which the fundamental distinction between the Mission of Jesus Christ, concerning primarily the individual, and His own Message, directed more particularly to mankind as a whole, has been definitely established: 'Verily, He [Jesus] said: "Come ye after Me, and I will make you to become fishers of men." In this day, however, We say: 'Come ye after Me, that We may make you to become the quickeners of mankind.'""

(Shoghi Effendi)

The seeking soul who accepts Baha'u'llah finds light upon light and a great amount of work to be done in service to the Kingdom of God, conferring joy, both in this world and in the next.

Friday, 24 August 2007

Secular thinker envisaged universal religion

Recent posts on this blog have been discussing the idea that religion evolves. An interesting sidelight of the subject appears in Jack Mclean's blog.

Jack notes that Eric Fromm wrote on the development of a new universalistic religion in his 1955 book, The Sane Society. It seems Fromm may have been influenced by a Baha'i he was corresponding with. Fromm is quoted thus:

The most important feature of such a religion will be its universalistic character, corresponding to the unification of mankind which is taking place in this epoch; it would embrace the humanistic teachings common to all the great religions of the East and of the West; its doctrines would not contradict the rational insight of mankind today, and its emphasis would be on the practice of life, rather than on doctrinal beliefs.

See:


Pilgrim's Notes: Eric Fromm and the Bahá'í Faith

technorati tags:, , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 6 August 2007

Religion a tribalistic force?

My discussion with biologist Dan Rhoads on his Migrations blog is continuing. Dan feels that religion is an ethnocentric force, rooted in humanity's tribal past. Supplementary to my comments on Dan's blog, here are some Baha'i quotations on the theme of religion's progressively unifying influence on civilization over the course of history.

Unification of the whole of mankind is the hall-mark of the stage which human society is now approaching. Unity of family, of tribe, of city-state, and nation have been successively attempted and fully established. World unity is the goal towards which a harassed humanity is striving. Nation-building has come to an end. The anarchy inherent in state sovereignty is moving towards a climax. A world, growing to maturity, must abandon this fetish, recognize the oneness and wholeness of human relationships, and establish once for all the machinery that can best incarnate this fundamental principle of its life.

(Shoghi Effendi, The World Order of Baha'u'llah, p. 202)

Just as the organic evolution of mankind has been slow and gradual, and involved successively the unification of the family, the tribe, the city-state, and the nation, so has the light vouchsafed by the Revelation of God, at various stages in the evolution of religion, and reflected in the successive Dispensations of the past, been slow and progressive. Indeed the measure of Divine Revelation, in every age, has been adapted to, and commensurate with, the degree of social progress achieved in that age by a constantly evolving humanity.


(Shoghi Effendi, The Promised Day is Come, p. 117)


In cycles gone by, though harmony was established, yet, owing to the absence of means, the unity of all mankind could not have been achieved. Continents remained widely divided, nay even among the peoples of one and the same continent association and interchange of thought were wellnigh impossible. Consequently intercourse, understanding and unity amongst all the peoples and kindreds of the earth were unattainable. In this day, however, means of communication have multiplied, and the five continents of the earth have virtually merged into one. And for everyone it is now easy to travel to any land, to associate and exchange views with its peoples, and to become familiar, through publications, with the conditions, the religious beliefs and the thoughts of all men. In like manner all the members of the human family, whether peoples or governments, cities or villages, have become increasingly interdependent. For none is self-sufficiency any longer possible, inasmuch as political ties unite all peoples and nations, and the bonds of trade and industry, of agriculture and education, are being strengthened every day. Hence the unity of all mankind can in this day be achieved.


(Abdu'l-Baha, Selections from the Writings of Abdu'l-Baha, p. 31)

technorati tags:, , , , ,

Sunday, 5 August 2007

Response to "Religion and Ethnocentrism: Is Religion Adaptive"

Dan Rhoads kindly invited my comments on his new post, "Religion and Ethnocentrism: Is Religion Adaptive". My response to his stimulating essay is posted below. It also appears as a comment on Dan's Migrations blog.


Dan,

Thanks for letting me know, via my blog, of your post, and inviting my comments. I'm delighted you did that, taking it as a welcome and encouraging compliment.

The essay you've written after attending Allen MacNeill's class gives an impressively interesting and thoughtful survey of some of the issues arising from the scientific study of religion from an evolutionary biology perspective. Congratulations on the effort you put into it.

The increasing attention evidently being given to religion amongst evolutionary scientists and in other scientific fields is highly a positive development which must lead to gains in understanding of the nature of religion, a phenomenon that plays a central role in civilization and individual psychology. In particular, science is beginning to demonstrate that religion is in essence a single phenomenon, from the viewpoint of its role in human nature, albeit that numerous "religions" and "sects" provide an endless variety of examples of the phenomenon. When this realization takes hold more widely in society, it promises to alleviate the tribalism (as you call it), that bedevils adherence to religion in a globalising world. Such a realization is analogous to the realization resulting from scientific study that biologically there is no such thing as separate races amongst humanity, which dealt a death-blow to racist concepts and ideologies. It has been proven that biologically, regardless of superficial differences, mankind is one. It seems it will soon be demonstrated scientifically that in religious propensities, too, mankind is essentially one. One other contextual point I want to make is that although my perspective is that of a religious believer, I have the utmost respect for science, and consider that its clear findings should be readily accepted.

As your account shows, religion and the dynamics of social life have been closely intertwined from the earliest times down to the present. The story (history) of religion and the story of social evolution go hand in hand. Religious doctrines, practices and institutions have glued societies together. Religions have served to confer legitimacy on kings and rulers, provided a common language and symbolic models whereby the people as a whole could understand their place in belonging to their societies, and offered social occasions, such as collective worship services, where people formed a sense of solidarity with one another beyond groupings of family, occupation and class. As is often noted in this context, the word religion comes from a Latin word which literally means to tie, fasten, or bind. One of the primary functions of religion, then, is to bind people together. (Its other primary function is to strengthen the psycho-spiritual wholeness of the individual.)

It is pretty much a universal law that the survival of individual entities is best ensured by being part of a larger group. The cell can best survive as part of a body. The individual animal can best survive as part of a pack, flock, or troupe, etc. Survival for most human beings is nearly impossible if cut off from society. This factor drives the evolutionary process in the direction of larger and larger agglomerations of entities.

Describing religion as a feature of tribalism is correct insofar as it applies to the tribal stage of social evolution, but religion has also been central to the life of the larger groupings that emerged when tribes banded into city-states, nations and empires. The survival-value of religion is not limited to tribes, but arises from its unifying efficacy in societies of small scale or large. In fact, religion has often taken the lead in promoting larger groupings and wider loyalties. Christianity at its inception was a movement with a mission aimed at overcoming all forms of artificial barriers between people. As St. Paul wrote to his fellow-Christians, "For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit." This expressed a spiritual conception parallel to the multi-tribal material civilization of the Roman Empire. In the end it proved to be a more effective conception than the Roman pantheon, eventually winning an Emperor to its side, and a large proportion of the populace. When Islam appeared on the scene, it went even further in promoting wider loyalties. Muhammad's teachings were very explicit not only in upholding the ideal of all under Islam being "one in spirit", to use St. Paul's term, but also in laying out laws and social structures giving practical effect to this vision. A nation state is a society existing in a particular territory, that is able to maintain its unity while accommodating people of various ethnicities and religions. An archetypal model for such a society was Arabia under Muhammad. This is too big a subject to go into in detail, so I will have to be content with flagging it as an area for investigation.

I have reservations about the statement you made that: "Since the expansion of the Judeo-Christian model of monotheism, not much changed for a while, until notable a shift towards secularization." This statement appears to overlook the huge contribution of Islam to the developments that produced modern civilization. Unfortunately this contribution continues to be under-recognized in the West. Not long ago I read substantial a book by a French historian (whose name escapes me right now), that managed to survey the gamut of cultural developments in Europe since the Renaissance without once mentioning the debt that Europe owes to Islam. I submit that this Euro-centric blind spot of Western scholarship seriously undermines Western understanding of religion. Its no accident that the Renaissance began in Italy, a part of Europe in close contact with the Islamic world through trade and geographic proximity. What has this got to do with the present discussion? Islam fills in an important missing link in the story. Religion consistently has a progressive, boundary-expanding effect, but this fact is obscured when the progression of religion in the West is assumed to be Judaism, to Christianity, to Enlightenment humanism. I suggest that the impulses that lead to the Enlightenment came out of the Islamic world.

Regarding your conclusion, I'm 100% with you in applauding decency, science and the rule of law. Yet the historical experience of humankind that has given us these concepts was thoroughly imbued with religion. The concepts may be termed secular in the sense that they are not bound up with the doctrines of any religion in particular, and in general are subscribed to by any modern sensible person. On the other hand, they are "religious" concepts because they are in the domain of thought that religion has always dealt with, and are an outcome of historical movements that originated in religion. Increasingly it is being seen that humankind has a common religious heritage. The most far reaching proposals and plan of action for overcoming the boundaries of nationalism and all forms of prejudice and discrimination in the world today are those of the Baha'i religion. The core impulse of religion is not towards tribalism, but towards ever-greater unity.

Regrettably I haven't had time to adequately clarify/justify all of my statements above, but I hope that overall my response does not disappoint as initial feedback. I've been taking a break from blogging interactions because of OOS and the need to deal with various challenges. But I'm very glad that such a stimulating correspondent as yourself has prompted me out of hibernation. Thanks for your kind best wishes. My greetings too, for your health, wealth, and happiness!

technorati tags:, , , ,

Sunday, 15 April 2007

Does religion meet reality?

Roger Scruton, an English philosopher, has posted a blog article, "Better off without religion?", giving a particularly clear and lucid account of the role of religion in meeting needs that are fundamental to human nature and to civilization.

A similar theme continues to be discussed between me and Dan Rhoads, on Dan's evolution-oriented blog, "Migrations", under "Is religion adapative?". This discussion went dormant for a couple of weeks, but has revived, under prompting from thoughts expressed by Roger Scruton and people commenting on his article.

These discussions are likely to be stimulating for anyone with an interest in the relationship between science and religion, and the role that religion plays in society.

Saturday, 31 March 2007

Is religion adaptive?

An interesting discussion has been taking place on the Migrations blog on the question: is religion adaptive? The point of view being explored is whether the capacity for religious experience is an evolutionary adaptation, and assuming that it is, whether it is still useful. Dan, the "owner" of the blog, feels that religion has had its day. I've offered some observations to the contrary.

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

One God, One Word, One World

Religion’s true purpose is to serve as the ark of salvation; not as a stronghold of superstition. But, for at least two centuries, and increasingly over that time, it has lost credibility because of its association with irrational beliefs and sectarian conflict. Beginning in the West and now affecting the whole planet in varying degrees, a secular world-view has been taking over as the ideology on which the leading institutions of society base their plans and on which individuals depend when deciding on their goals and conduct. Religious groups have responded to the erosion of their creeds’ traditional authority in diverging ways, which might be summed up in three broad tendencies. An inward-looking stream has retreated into a backwater of piety that hankers for the past; an aggressive troop has gone on the offensive, assailing bastions of the modern world in debate or even with violence; and a cultured school has devised various accommodations with modern ideas. None of these responses has shown any real ability to restore the voice of religion to a central role in human affairs. Strategies of retreat only increase the gap between faith and everyday life. Attacking modern science and social structures, head on, is an absurd struggle that is doomed to fail repeatedly, causing public revulsion for doctrines that inspire acts of stupidity and wanton destruction. Accommodation, especially in its more extreme forms, tends to water down the essential truths that religion must champion, so as to exercise spiritual influence and attract devotion.


And yet, alongside the many inadequate reactions, a response with much more promise is emerging. This response is seen in growing endeavours by religious believers to understand more deeply the Holy Books they revere, in the light of modern knowledge and conditions. This response combines acceptance of the undeniable realities of modern life with reverence for the wisdom of age-old, timeless sacred teachings, enabling the discovery of insights that may turn out to have surprising significance for people everywhere. It is a response that celebrates the sacred without retreating from the world, combats materialism without promoting fanatical attitudes, and accommodates modern knowledge without betraying essential principles. The endeavour to understand anew the narratives, parables and precepts contained in Sacred Scriptures, if pursued courageously, will surely bring more of the oxygen of truth into a religious vacuum that is presently stifling the human spirit. A growing effort to develop enlightened interpretations of the Holy Books is restoring to religion a truly effective means for strengthening its voice in society. By this means, which consists of great spiritual truths expressed intelligibly, the guidance that religion offers will become more convincing and inspiring. And there is no doubt that the people of the world desperately need dependable guidance, if we are to solve the bewildering problems we face.


Many severe conflicts are raging around the globe, in which religious differences play a major part. A fuller understanding of the true nature of religion throws light on the deep causes of these conflicts and contributes to resolving them. But more than this, releasing religious commitment from the shackles of superstition, and thereby attracting people to centre their lives on spiritual ideals, releases a powerful source of constructive energy. Genuine religious commitment generates a selfless motivation that is fulfilled in striving to better the lives of others. By nature it detests conflict, poverty, environmental degradation, crime, illiteracy, ethnic hatred, and the gamut of ills the world suffers. When it has gained enough support, it will seek to eradicate these evils from the planet. Religion will then be meeting its true purpose as the ark of human salvation.


What is religion?


True religion is the basis of divine civilization”, wrote ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, seeing religion as a force which profoundly affects the whole range of human experience and activity that civilization involves. A secular mindset has difficulty in appreciating such a positive and all-encompassing concept of religion. As an American commentator on the “Islam Today” website, “Yahya M.”, observes: “the materialism of the modern world has put all religions on the defensive, trying harder and harder to justify their existence in the face of skepticism and indifference.” He notes a trend among some of his fellow Muslims as well as among the followers of other faiths, including Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and Christians, to describe their particular faith as a “way of life”, rather than a religion. He perceptively writes:

Something must have gone wrong with the whole concept of “religion” in the modern world! It is as though people have decided to dump all the negative associations of religion into the word “religion” and drive it out of their fold, as the “scapegoat” was used by the ancient Israelites. Each of them redefines “religion” as The Other and therefore inferior. The positive side of their faith that they wish to emphasize is then blessed with the phrase “way of life,” which must now be thought of as preferable, more appealing to the Zeitgeist.i

From another perspective, all the religions are indeed “ways of life”, for one of the primary concerns of religion is to mould those values and habits of individuals and communities that form their ways of life. Religion operates in the realm of thought and action where concepts on how we should live are developed, shared, and carried out. An idea of religion along these lines was adopted by Albert Einstein in a lecture he gave in 1941, in which he called on clerical leaders to take religion in a new direction.ii In his view, the “doctrine of a personal God interfering in natural events” was outdated, but religion was still needed for nurturing “those forces which are capable of cultivating the Good, the True, and the Beautiful in humanity itself.” According to Einstein, “science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action: it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts.”1 In other words, he suggested that religion helps us to select our goals, while science shows us how to accomplish them. By the same token, “science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration towards truth and understanding. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion.”


Einstein had a view of revealed religion that has definite drawbacks, but as he knew as well as anyone what science is about, his perception that religion performs a necessary function for humankind—one that science is unable to perform—is persuasive. It gives a good starting point for further reflection. The function of establishing values, performed by religion, is evidently necessary because it arises from the freedom of the human conscious mind to choose from a range of possibilities, rather than being bound by animal instinct. When faced with choices, the conscious mind inevitably must ask what it should do (as well as what it can do). This is the essence of the human condition. Therefore, in guiding our actions, religion gives direction to capacities that are intrinsic to human nature. It deals with issues that somehow, must be dealt with. Responding to this need, particular religions and sects offer specific answers to questions that arise in developing a way of life. They explain the purpose of the universe, signpost the way to salvation or enlightenment, and establish ethical guidelines governing interaction between people. For centuries the great religions, collectively, have convinced the vast majority of humankind of the cogency of their visions of what it means to be human and how to go about living a good life. Only in relatively recent times have secular ideologies claimed to offer alterative world views, independent of religion. Such ideologies appeal mostly to the intellect, but religion’s historic effectiveness shows that its comprehensive approach, reaching into the heart and soul as well as convincing the mind, should not be dismissed. Religion creates a rich temple of meaning. When it is in a sound state, individuals and communities vibrantly live out their whole existences within its benevolent framework. If it is currently showing signs of decay, we should not suppose it is going to finally collapse, for it is built from eternally renewable resources.



Returning to Einstein, he urged the clergy of existing religions to engage in a “refining process” that would develop a kind of religion free from allegiance to a “personal God”. Did he have the right idea of the way forward? From the point of view of monotheism, it is a highly doubtful proposal. The monotheistic religions would not find it viable to abandon their central premise that God speaks to humankind. The very heart of their authority would evaporate. Those who, like Einstein, reject this foundational premise of monotheism, expect that any form of religion which claims to communicate the will of God to humankind will soon fade from the scene.2 But, before rejecting an idea that has been influential for at least 4,000 years, it seems wiser to explore the meaning of belief in God and to consider the possibility of understanding it in ways that make sense to the modern mind. Just as modern philosophy rests on the foundations built by Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, modern religion needs to grow from its roots in the past. The idea of a “natural religion”, which supposedly can be invented by eminent thinkers without resort to divine inspiration, is a conceit with no hope of success, for it makes a total break with what religion has always been. Religion is a much more mysterious phenomenon, springing from a far more exalted Source, than what is apparently imagined by the promoters of such naturalistic theories.


As a starting point for reconsidering the roots of religion, here is a lightening-sketch of the history of monotheism. In ancient times, Abraham heard the Voice of God commanding Him to leave His homeland, and to set out on a migration that was to become a symbol of faithful obedience to generations of believers after Him. “By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to set out for a place that he was to receive as an inheritance; and he set out, not knowing where he was going.” (Bible, Hebrews 11:8.) Passing over Jacob and Joseph, the next colossal Figure to advance the cause of the “God of Abraham” was Moses, who transformed a people enslaved into a nation emancipated by its devotion to divine law. A series of Prophets followed in Moses’ shadow, interpreting to the people of Israel the duties implied by their role as a “chosen people”, culminating in the appearance of Jesus. In just a few years of ministry, Jesus transformed the Mosaic religion. He brought to light its inner animating spirit, giving it a new universal form which could, and eventually did, spread throughout the world. A little over six centuries later, in Arabia, the Prophet Muhammad founded Islam, announcing guidance that the One God was revealing once again to humankind, as recorded in the Qur’an. Islam lifted monotheism to a new level of sophistication in its concepts, exalting God far above popular anthropomorphic images, and producing philosophical and practical achievements in the Islamic world that were to become highly influential in the West as well. Then, in nineteenth century Iran, the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh launched another Movement in the monotheistic line: the Bahá’í Faith, which has in a short time gained enthusiastic followers in every country of the globe, demonstrating once more the inexhaustible vitality of “the ancient faith of God”.


In this stream of history, how was the Voice of God known to be heard? Abraham’s encounter with God is described in the Biblical book of Genesis in words such as these: “… the word of the LORD came to Abram in a vision, ‘Do not be afraid, Abram, I am your shield; your reward shall be very great.’ … [the LORD] brought him outside and said, ‘Look toward heaven and count the stars, if you are able to count them.’ Then he said to him, ‘So shall your descendants be.’” (Genesis 15:1 & 15:5.) Regarding Moses, the book of Exodus states: “The glory of the LORD settled on Mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it for six days; on the seventh day he called to Moses out of the cloud. Now the appearance of the glory of the LORD was like a devouring fire on the top of the mountain in the sight of the people of Israel. Moses entered the cloud, and went up on the mountain. Moses was on the mountain for forty days and forty nights.” (Exodus 24:16–18) Concerning Jesus, the Gospel of Mark states: “
And just as he was coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens torn apart and the Spirit descending like a dove on him. And a voice came from heaven, ‘You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.’” (Mark 1:10-11.) And this is the testimony given by Muhammad on the Source of His inspiration, from the Qur’an, Surah 53 (“The Star”):

By the Star when it setteth, your comrade erreth not, nor is deceived; nor doth he speak of (his own) desire. It is naught save an inspiration that is inspired, which one of mighty powers hath taught him, one vigorous; and he grew clear to view when he was on the uppermost horizon. Then he drew nigh and came down till he was (distant) two bows’ length or even nearer, and He revealed unto His slave that which He revealed. The heart lied not (in seeing) what it saw. Will ye then dispute with him concerning what he seeth? And verily he saw him yet another time by the lote-tree of the utmost boundary3, nigh unto which is the Garden of Abode. When that which shroudeth did enshroud the lote-tree, the eye turned not aside nor yet was overbold. Verily he saw one of the greater revelations of his Lord.


On each of these decisive occasions, a cloud of mystery “enshrouds” the event. It is accompanied with signs and depicted in symbols. In each instance, what took place was a direct experience of the Prophet’s, which took place: “in a vision”, in “the cloud”, “suddenly”, when perceiving “an inspiration that is inspired”. This is plainly so in Muhammad’s case, the Qur’an having brought down to us an authentic record of His own description of it—as something that His “heart” saw. The tenor of the various accounts shows that their significance is not to be understood with a narrow and literal mindset. They are potent with meaning. The Voice which guided Abraham on His way disclosed extraordinary secrets in a manner that provokes wonderment, especially when reading the whole story. The “devouring fire” that the people of Israel witnessed on Mount Sinai signified not just light and heat, but within it, “the Glory of the LORD”. Mark’s simile of the descent of the Spirit on Jesus “like a dove”4, suggests a multitude of thoughts, starting with associations with flight, freedom, and peace. Further advice against a literal approach comes from scholars who caution that the accounts given in Genesis and Exodus did not necessarily originate from the Prophets themselves, but were perhaps made up by others, long after the Prophets’ passing, for the purpose of elucidating the meaning of what happened. A sophisticated approach drawing on scholarship and applying literary skills yields essential insights, but a certain mode of analysis goes too far. Skeptics are inclined explain away these reports as mere fabulous tales, or as descriptions of ecstatic psychological states, not unlike madness. They overshoot the mark. In the allusive language of metaphor, these accounts point to the origin that religions have sprung from, in the minds of those who founded them. And in justice, we need to admit the extraordinary achievement that constitutes the founding of a religion, which is, after all, a movement destined to lead millions, for centuries. The Prophets succeeded because their teachings had convincing authority. Hence, the accounts of their “meetings” with God represent a profound reality. Although it seems utterly beyond the reach of our minds to gain any glimpse of the means, the reasonable conclusion is that the Intelligence which orders the universe also somehow “speaks” to us through the divine genius of the Prophets. As Muhammad declared: “The heart lied not (in seeing) what it saw.”


There is a close link between the Message and the Messengers. The picture that emerges from the lives of the Prophets is that these were individuals of exceptional moral qualities, who seemed to possess a penetrating insight into the underlying reality of things. They displayed this insight not only on occasions of wonder and awe like Moses’ ascent of Mount Sinai, but also in the midst of everyday life. Accounts of their wondrous meetings with God are apparently intended to dramatically emphasize the exceptional closeness that the Prophets had to the Source which inspires the insight they displayed. Moses proceeded alone into the cloud on Mount Sinai. Jesus heard a Voice from heaven saying, “You are My Son, the beloved”. Muhammad saw “One of mighty powers” approach to within “two bows length” of Him. These images are all strikingly expressive of the special intimacy the Prophets had with the divine Spirit; paradoxically combined with an overwhelming sense that the ultimate Source of the experience they had was totally ungraspable, even for the Prophet Himself. It is instructive that the revelation Muhammad saw (from which his “eye turned not aside”), was described enigmatically as something that enshrouds. This contradictory image is reminiscent of the bewildering marvel that Moses saw on Mount Horeb: “There the angel of the LORD appeared to him in a flame of fire out of a bush; he looked, and the bush was blazing, yet it was not consumed.” (Exodus 3:2.) Recounting what they “see”, the Prophets transmit the inscrutable wisdom of heaven in earthly words. From a human standpoint, these words are those of the Prophet himself, uttered in His mother tongue, bearing traces of His individual personality, making reference to events in His particular location and time, and expressed in conceptual terms familiar to the society which He belongs to. But the words of the Prophets, and their actions, overpower the limitations of time, place and culture. Their teachings convey world-shaking truths, and their lives demonstrate these truths in archetypal achievements, like leading Israel from the clutches of Pharaoh.


The Gospel of John identifies the divine Word directly with Jesus. “He was in the world, and the world came into being through him; yet the world did not know him.” (John 1:10) “And the Word became flesh and lived among us…” (John 1:14) Jesus is quoted by John as saying: “‘Whoever believes in me believes not in me but in him who sent me. And whoever sees me sees him who sent me. I have come as light into the world, so that everyone who believes in me should not remain in the darkness.” (John 12: 44–46) Jesus says to His disciples at the Last Supper: “Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works.” (John 14:10) The declaration by Jesus that he had come “as light into the world”, echoes the report of Exodus of the light that shone from the face of Moses. “Moses came down from Mount Sinai. As he came down from the mountain with the two tablets of the covenant in his hand, Moses did not know that the skin of his face shone because he had been talking with God. When Aaron and all the Israelites saw Moses, the skin of his face was shining, and they were afraid to come near him.” (Exodus 34:29–30) Muhammad is told by God in the Qur’an: “[This] book have we sent down unto thee, that thou mayest lead men forth from darkness into light, by the permission of their Lord, into the glorious and laudable way.” (Surah 14:1) Concerning Muhammad (the Apostle of God), the Qur’an says: “Ye have in the apostle of God an excellent example, unto him who hopeth in God, and the last day, and remembreth God frequently.” (Surah 33:21) What these varying perspectives have in common is an understanding that the light of God comes to humankind through the lives and teachings of the Prophets. Through them, the pre-existent Word, which gave being to the universe before time began, emerges from timelessness and becomes manifest in the human world.


‘Abdu’l-Bahá wrote: “religion is the teachings of the Lord God, teachings which constitute the very life of humankind”.iii On another occasion he said that the Word of God “gives forth the light of religion and bestows the life of the spirit, imbues humanity with archetypal virtues and confers eternal splendors. This Sun of Reality, this center of effulgences is the prophet or Manifestation of God.”iv The historical experience of religion is that it has been created by the Prophets, but this fact often seems to be overlooked. Religion is thought of as something invented and maintained by priests, or as a type of organization that adheres to certain beliefs, or as humankind’s attempts to explain matters of ultimate concern. These views are not entirely wrong, but they are inadequate. The nature of religion becomes much clearer when the central role of the Prophets, who were inspired by God, is acknowledged and upheld.


To be continued...



Footnotes

1 Regarding the assertion that religion “cannot justifiably speak of facts…”, we will come back to this later.

2 The discussion here leaves out non-monotheistic religions, such as (branches of) Hinduism and Buddhism, etc., so as not to introduce another level of complexity to the argument.

3 “Lote tree of the utmost boundary”— “This is used as a symbol in Islam, for example in the accounts of Muhammad’s Night Journey, to mark the point in the heavens beyond which neither men nor angels can pass in their approach to God, and thus to delimit the bounds of divine knowledge as revealed to mankind.” From a note to the official English translation of Bahá’u’lláh’s Kitab-i-Aqdas, note #128

4 “The phrase like a dove is a descriptive comparison. The Spirit is not a dove, but descended like one in some sort of bodily representation.” — Translators footnote to Mark 1:10 in the NET Bible, see www.bible.org/netbible/

i www.islamfortoday.com/islamisareligion.htm

iii Abdu'l-Baha, Selections from the Writings of Abdu'l-Baha, p. 52

iv Abdu'l-Baha, Foundations of World Unity, p. 10

My personal reflections on this blog take inspiration from the Bahá’í teachings.